Don't Panic! January 23 2002

Terror tips for the terrified

What does it mean to "freeze" the assets of terrorists?

On Sept. 24, President Bush issued an executive order freezing the financial assets of individuals and organizations the government deems are involved in or supportive of terrorism. When the feds say assets are frozen, they simply mean that it is illegal to move the asset (usually money) from where it is. Like turkey, fish and green beans, money just isn't as good once it's been frozen.

Here's an example: You're a terrorist with a savings account at Bank of (Death to) America. First of all, shame on you. With interest rates so low, you might as well put your money in a checking account. More importantly, if your account has been frozen, you cannot withdraw or transfer your money without the authorization of the Office of Foreign Assets Control of the U.S. Department of the Treasury. They actually have a phone number to call and a form to fill out to apply to get your assets thawed.

This isn't some new policy for terrorists only. We've been doing it to the governments of Iraq, Iran, Libya, North Korea and Cuba — not to mention drug traffickers — for years. Pretty effective, I'd say.

Freezing doesn't just apply to banks, but also to individuals and money-wiring services like Western Union. Failure to freeze an account that the government tells you to is punishable by hundreds of thousands of dollars in fines and up to 12 years in jail.

OFAC's list of terrorists and organizations whose accounts we've frozen is about 20 pages long and growing. It's an alphabetical list of mostly Arabic names, which isn't too surprising considering that militant fundamentalist Islam is a trendy threat these days.

The list includes a disproportionately large number of men named Ahmed, including Ahmed the Egyptian, Ahmed the Tall and Ahmed the Tanzanian (who also goes by Foopie). Hopefully American banks didn't wait until after 9-11 to stop doing business with the more obvious threatening names on this list. After all, did we really need an executive order to tell us that the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group might be a problem?

E-mail your questions to andisheh@creativeloafing.com.??

More By This Writer


Monday July 2, 2012 10:14 am EDT
Fourth of July has devolved into a mindless national block party. Here's what we should do about it. | more...


Wednesday September 7, 2011 04:30 am EDT
Ten years later, a TV terrorpalooza rings hollow | more...


Tuesday September 7, 2010 09:11 am EDT


My favorite foreign policy column cliché of the previous decade is, without a doubt, the Friedman Unit.

It’s a reference to New York Times foreign policy columnist Thomas Friedman. Fair and Accuracy in Reporting noted that, between November 2003 and May 2006, Friedman used some form of the phrase “the next six months is crucial in Iraq”...

| more...


Thursday August 26, 2010 02:42 pm EDT

The last U.S. combat troops left Iraq on August 19. War over. Woohoo!

Take that, you stupid 9/11 terrorists who had absolutely nothing at all to do with Saddam Hussein or Iraq. Boo ya!

No. Wait. Upon further review, it turns out the war isn’t exactly over.

The combat troops are out, but there are still roughly 50,000 non-combat troops in Iraq. Iraq still has the third largest foreign...

| more...


Tuesday August 24, 2010 12:04 am EDT

As someone who had to turn on the closed captioning during The Wire, I totally get this.

The Associated Press:

ATLANTA — Federal agents are seeking to hire Ebonics translators to help interpret wiretapped conversations involving targets of undercover drug investigations.

The Drug Enforcement Administration recently sent memos asking companies that provide translation services to help it find...

| more...
Search for more by Andisheh Nouraee

[Admin link: Don't Panic! January 23 2002]